STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS INDUS TOWERS LIMITED

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS INDUS TOWERS LIMITEDStrategic leadinghipbasically means using system in the counselingof hiters. The chief(prenominal) strategy usually employed in a strategic mood of attractershipis to motivate track downers to proceeds the initiative to improve their productive remark into the compevery. Strategy involves thinking and course of studyning. leadinghipinspires others to amaze the appropriate action. Strategicleadershipis a troublemodel that trains and emboldens employees to best prep be the company for the proximo.Strategic leaders be al instructions looking ahead and analyzing the present in impairment of preparation for what whitethorn be ahead for the business. Aw arness is a tumid part of a strategicleadership bolt, but it must be fol pocket-sizeed up with well thought out action. Strategic leaders are adaptable and growth-oriented. They take responsibility for getting things done by instruction employees to think an d act more effectively to achieve the best conclusion possible for the company.1.2. The Impact of Management and Leadership Styles on Strategic Decisions go with BackgroundAircel congregation is a mobile phone service supplier in india. It offers both prepaid and postpaid GSM Cellular phone coverage throughout India. Aircel is a joint venture between Maxis Communication of Malaysia and Apollo hospital Enterprise Ltd of India. UTSB has a 74% stake in Aircel and the remaining 26% is with Apollo Hospitals. It is Indias Seventh largest GSM mobile service provider with a saluter stall of over 51.83 million, as of January 31, 2011. It has a market share of 6.72% among the GSM operators in the country. As on date, Aircel is present in all 23 telecom circles. Aircel dictated an actual dinghy lifeboat to a downtown billboard. A rope with a sign reading, In case of emergency, cut rope, held up the branded raft. July 15, 2009 the monsoon arrived with moderate full streets and so did Aircel customer service. The dinghy was cut down and pedestrians were safely transported. What Aircel calls somatic Social Responsibility A Solution. The company was able to generate domineering publicity and show consumers that they care.Aircel is famous for innovative Pocket Internet card for Free GPRS service for 1day/3days/7days/30days. Aircel become first to introduce Online service to subscribe and manage Dialer tunes. It is first in country to introduce SMS bank/ call Book/Reminder/Talking SMS.In the past several decades, management experts crap undergone a revolution in how they define leadership and what their attitudes are toward it. They do gone from a very classical despotic accession to a very creative, participative approach. Somewhere along the line, it was watch outd that non everything sometime(a) was bad and not everything new was unattackable. Rather, different personal manners were affected for different situations and for each one leader needed to know when to exhibit a particular approach.1.3.Leadership Styles squirt Be Adopted For Different SituationsA leadership direction gaze is a innovative thinking of starting about leadership. using leadership demeanor in organization is a different way from leadership competencies of explaining leadership.Leadership carriage is the essential quality in the organization, implementing plans, innovative thinking, initiative, ca role the police squad membersThree of the most basic leadership rooms are ascendent individuationDemocraticAutocraticThis is something one peson conclusion, the leader tells the employees what to do and what not to do, the employees dont have any option they have to follow their leader instructions. The employees dont have the broad-minded granting immunity by thinking of innovative or they vend take any initiatives in the work or growth for the organization.This style peck be followed only if the employees have all the sources in the hand, because i ts something the leader orders to the employees and they follow them, so if every information is available to the employees they discharge exhaust the work with in the time frame of the limit. Actually this type of style should not be use as it is a emergency case. If we need initiatives and commitment from our employees we have to motivate our employees, so we have to follow the participative style. In this autocratic style we have a gap leaders and employees this leads to uncomely communication and understanding.Laissez FaireIn this style the leader gives the full liberty to the employees to take there own decision. But its not something terminal what the employee does, the employee has every rights to take the decision, However leader is responsible for whatever the decision is been made, The decision can be made where the employee should know about the in and out of the transit and analyse the situation how the decision can be made, we cant make the blind decision, we can set the target to complete the task.This is not a style we can blame the employees if things went wrong, its something we are trusting employees and having confidence of the concourse who work below us. We should not afraid of using this style, we can use it wisely, by following this style employees impart gain confidence and they can grow as an future leader.DemocraticThis is the current style used in the organization, this style leader and employee merge together and comes to the final decision. Because authentic things can be assessed only by the employees and not by the leader. The work done by the employees cannot be predicted how to handle this issue in the feverish situation. So the leader has no other go to contact the employees for final decision. Its not something the employees can take the final decision, it should be authorized by the leader, then it may get in to final decision. This style shows the good understanding between the employees and the leader.The employe e recruited are highly skilled. Using this style provide benefit the organization as well as it creates the good coition with the leader and employees.2.1.The Selected theories of management and leadership have on organizational strategyUnder the autocratic leadership style in the organisation, The leader has the military sort of centralized decision qualification in the organisation. This is common to the directive style from organizational situational leadership Autocratic managers do not entertain any idea or initiatives from coworkers. The autocratic management is laboursaving to the managers because it gives a actualization to the team and organisation as well as it motivates the manager. It helps in tender decision making, as he is the only to decide for the firm team and the manager keeps decision to himself until he feels that is necessary to be shared to the coworkers. The autocrat tells others what not to do and what to do but not necessarily why it might be an a ppropriate model for the organisation where the team has low experience and skills or It has to be used in the effective way in the organisation with modern work forces.Participative or democratic styleThe democratic leadership style advantage decision making by the stem as shown, such as first leader will set up the meeting with the group and he asks for the suggestions then he will give instructions to the group members. This style is more helpful for the managers so that the group member will be cooperative to the managers, and they may be motivated effectively and positively by the managers. The decision of the democratic leader is not unilateral as with the autocrat, because generally they used to talk of with group members and they will get a final idea with the group, and in the end the manager will go for suggestion and ideas so that all the group members will participate by them. Democratic is not something is put to the voting it is the manager involves in to the part icipation of the group of members and make decision consulting with the group member and he has every right to take the own decision and cascade the final decision to the team members. If some one could not follow or discuss with the team members then it may be a weak leadership.Free rein style or Laissez-faireA free-rein leader does not lead, leaves the group freely entirely on its own as shown such as leader allows maximum liberal freedom to the group members, i.e they have given a liberal freedom and suggestions in choosing their own policies and procedure methods.2.2.Leadership Stretegy Supports organizational directionIts to remember the election situations for alternative leadership styles in the organisation. In the emergency time we have only little time only and where as in designated leave has more experience in the organisation or the rest of the whole team if they follow the autocratic leadership that would be more effective. In the case of highly motivated and designa ted team with a cognition take of expertise, a more democratic or laissez faire style may be much more effective.When I complete the strategic leadership style survey I should remember that the leadership style has adopted and that would be the most effective and achieves the objective of the whole while balancing the chase of members of individuals.Also this leadership style survey is provided the answer but its not something we got the right answers, but I have the opportunities to ask the right knowledge questions in a right time about the leadership style at present and in the future cases.3.1. Appropriate Method to followup current leadership requirementsJun Liu Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China Xiaoyu Liu School of motor Relations Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China Abstract Leadership question has gone through several phases of development in the past 80 years or so. The paper identifies the major theories in each phase, and investigates the strengths and weaknesses of the research. Among those theories, transformational/ charismatic leadership and leader-member exchange (LMX) are heavily discussed. The paper also discusses the future trend of research in leadership areas. Keywords Review, Transformational Leadership, LMX Leadership can be defined as a affect that an individual influences a group of individuals to implement strategies and achieve the collective goals (Yukl, 2002). Research in the area seeks to get down out what types of leadersare likely to be successful and what factors determine leadership effectiveness. Generally, leadership research has gone though four paradigms peculiarity approach, behavioral approach, situational approach, and the contemporary theories of leadership. The paradigms of leadership theories shift with the progress from static to fighting(a) view of leadership with the mark and behavioral theories reflecting a personal, the situational theori es an interpersonal, and the contemporary theories a comparative approach to conceptualizing leadership. That is to say leadership has been examined as intrapersonal competencies, interpersonal processes, and relational dynamics. More specifically, I review those approaches, their strengths and weaknesses as followed The trait approach The trait theories assumed that leaders were born, not made. In the literature, Stogdill (1948, 1974) completed two panoptic reviews by synthesizing more than 200 studies of the trait approach. His two surveys identified a group3.2.plan for the development of future situations requiring leadership-poor management performance-low employee morale-unstable organization structure-unsustainable business practices-high employee turnover-unable to manage diversity-Poor careful organizational performance improvement-Decreased quality of management-Poor Healthy organizational climate--Lower morale-Increased labor turnover-Lack Organizational and personal g rowth-Poor teamwork-Lack of retentiveness strategies-talent leaving the organization.-chronic industrial relations problems-no means of resolving employee grievances-increasing employee turnover-inter-group conflicts-dissatisfaction with hold and conditions-unclear job roles-no clear performance measures-poor recruitment standards / practices-no management development programs-no inference training for new employees-critical skill shortages-inter-departmental conflict-lack of sufficient skills / power bases in the organization.-lack of appropriate leadership skills within the organization?-lack organization structure flexibilty in the face of changing demands. round have no clear roles and responsibilities?-lack of procedures and management practices to facilitate the accomplishment of tasks.-lack of staff potential spotting and development for the future.-lack of staff encouragement to perform well through the giving of recognition, feedback, etc.-staff do no know what their ex pected performance standards are.-organizations systems do not encourage effective performance among your staff.-systems are not consistent across the organization.-there are no clear rewards for effective performance within the work group.4.1. ontogeny leadership skills for a specific requirementsLeadership has been described as the process of social influence in which one person can pursue the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.Alan Keith of Genentech states that, Leadership is ultimately about creating a way for people to contribute to making something extraordinary happen.According to Ken SKC Ogbonnia, effective leadership is the ability to successfully integrate and maximize available resources within the internal and external environment for the attainment of organizational or societal goals.The above characteristics of being leaders they are controlling and directing day to day business, they support the staff, they work as chefs and waiters a nd they try to achieve the best profit they can.4.2. Useful methods to plan the developing of leadership skillsBasic Skills inSolving the problem and devising the decisionStrategic PlanningDelegation of workInternal communications with the teamMeeting Management with the mentorManaging Yourself with in the organisation